Open mattgarrish opened 4 years ago
7.3 is not excluding any metadata vocabulary that can be expressed using the package document's meta
tags. All it does is clarify that the link
element cannot be used to link to records.
Accepted
Action: make Clause 7.3 a note.
Rather than make 7.3 a note, I think we can do without it provided we make the lists in 7.2 slightly clearer.
What I propose is to add "in the EPUB Package Document metadata section" to the end of each, so we get sentences like:
Discoverable EPUB Publications shall include the following accessibility metadata in the EPUB Package Document metadata section:
It's a stretch to say that a linked record with accessibility metadata meets this requirement.
Any thoughts?
/cc @GeorgeKerscher @avneeshsingh @murata2makoto
Personally, I feel that this would be a major change. If we want to do this, it could come at the next revision at the W3C.
My $.02
So do we reject making it a note and leave it as-is?
JWG7 has not officially agreed on the comment disposition yet. Francis (SC34 chair) and I asked Yong-Sang and Sam Oh to have a JWG7 teleconf. In that teleconf, we might want to have a look at this issue.
Since this document does not define specific representations of embedded metadata, it is not reasonable to eliminate one possible representation.
Proposed Change: We propose to drop 7.3
(Clause 7.3)