Open Zysty opened 5 years ago
So the 'NLRG' in code is actually the 'LSRAG' in paper.But I find that 'LSRAG' ('NLRG' in code) is ended with a convolution layer in code( 'self.conv_last(x)') .
Hi, I find another issue. In the code, The batch_size default setting in option.py is 16 and there is no related settings in TrainSAN_scripts.sh. In the paper, 'In each min-batch, 8 LR color patches with size 48 × 48 are provided as inputs. ' Does it means the batch_size is set to 8?
Hi, I find another issue. In the code, The batch_size default setting in option.py is 16 and there is no related settings in TrainSAN_scripts.sh. In the paper, 'In each min-batch, 8 LR color patches with size 48 × 48 are provided as inputs. ' Does it means the batch_size is set to 8?
when i use batch_size=16 for training on 1080ti out of memory.
在论文中 batch_size=32,但是设置的是16,按照代码设置的来跑Set5 x2的结果是37.713,比论文中的小很多
Hi, I find another issue. In the code, The batch_size default setting in option.py is 16 and there is no related settings in TrainSAN_scripts.sh. In the paper, 'In each min-batch, 8 LR color patches with size 48 × 48 are provided as inputs. ' Does it means the batch_size is set to 8?
when i use batch_size=16 for training on 1080ti out of memory.
what's your running result?
Hi, thanks for your work.
I can not find any information about 'LSRAG' in the code of ‘san.py’.
In the code, I find the 'SOCA' is not at the tail of NLRG and there is still one Conv layer following 'SOCA'. Additionally, san consists of several NLRGs(n_resgroups). In the paper, SAN just has one NLRG,which consists of several LSRAG. So I think the 'NLRG' in code is actually the 'LSRAG' in paper. Is it right? And if it is right, why is the SOCA followed by a Conv layer? In paper,the SOCA is at the tail of LSRAG.
I want to know the reason about the difference.Looking forward to your reply.