Closed ThuyTien1 closed 2 years ago
Hello all, I generated list of regions from gff3 as following:
1 havana exon 939275 939291 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000420190;Name=ENSE00001608769;constitutive=0;ensembl_end_phase=0;ensembl_phase=1;exon_id=ENSE00001608769;rank=7;version=1 1 havana exon 935772 935793 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000437963;Name=ENSE00001631320;constitutive=0;ensembl_end_phase=0;ensembl_phase=2;exon_id=ENSE00001631320;rank=5;version=1 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943253 943377 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000616016 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943698 943808 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000616016 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943908 944581 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000616016 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943698 943808 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000618323 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943908 944581 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000618323 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 942856 943058 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000618323 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943253 943377 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000620200 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943698 943808 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000620200 1 ensembl three_prime_UTR 943908 944581 . + . Parent=transcript:ENST00000620200
Then I applied gffutils.pybedtools_integration.to_bedtool on this list to generate a bedtools object. After that, I performed pybedtools.merge(d=500, s=True) on this bedtools object and get following result
gffutils.pybedtools_integration.to_bedtool
pybedtools.merge(d=500, s=True)
1 935771 935793 + 1 939274 939291 + 1 942855 944581 +
May I ask why do we have 935771 instead of 935772?
935771
935772
Oops, sorry for bothering you guys. The reason is that bed is 0-based while gff is 1-based
Hello all, I generated list of regions from gff3 as following:
Then I applied
gffutils.pybedtools_integration.to_bedtool
on this list to generate a bedtools object. After that, I performedpybedtools.merge(d=500, s=True)
on this bedtools object and get following resultMay I ask why do we have
935771
instead of935772
?