Add fontawesome5 to allow awesomebox to work

[vvishnyakov]

Possibly also worth bringing the tests across that are in #160 ?

I am guessing that alpine will be preferred base in the future, as I also had multiple issues I wasn't able to resolve in my attempts in getting fontawesome5 playing nice with debian.

[daamien]

Hi @vvishnyakov !

Thanks a lot for this, I was not aware of this fontawesome5 package.

Yes the alpine variant is the future of this project, we're trying to stay on the same track that the pandoc:latex image and get a more streamlined release cycle ( https://github.com/pandoc/dockerfiles#alpine-linux ). Hopefully we will make some progress in a few days.

Keep in mind that in future release we may split the alpine variant in 2 :

• alpine with the essentials packages
• and an alpine-full that would contains additionals fonts, locales and templates...

If that's the case fontawesome would go into alpine-full but that's would be open to discussion.

Thanks again for your contribution,

Regards