Closed cpholguera closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the report, I'll look into it
Sorry for the inconvinience
You can temporarly switch back to the 21.02
tag and your pipeline should work as previously
This is related to the latex underscore
package which breaks the build process when an image filename contains an underscore
Hi @daamien, now the issue is in the MASVS repo as well (we didn't try this when I posted the issue, so it is not really new).
Every language seems to work but the farsi version fails. This is the error:
Digest: sha256:dbb3c52f69b1abe2837a5ae99f250923868fca66707fc5e595ea83fafbbc8ae5
Status: Downloaded newer image for dalibo/pandocker:stable-full
Error producing PDF.
! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> \textormath
{\nobreak \discretionary {-}{}{\kern .03em}\ifvmode \...
l.208 انقلاب
Error: Process completed with exit code 43.
Hi @cpholguera
I'm currently working on upgrading the entire toolchain and I just a produced a new image based on ubuntu, Pandoc 2.19 and TexLive 2022... This is a huge leap forward and I have good hopes it will solve the problems we had with the underscore
package and other languages
Can you try to use temporarly the latest-ubuntu-full
tag and let me know if it works ?
I will, thank you very much @daamien!
@daamien Unfortunately I'm getting the following error:
Status: Downloaded newer image for dalibo/pandocker:latest-ubuntu-full
Error producing PDF.
! LaTeX Error: File `sectsty.sty' not found.
Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
Enter file name:
! Emergency stop.
<read *>
l.135 \sectionfont
@cpholguera
I added missing packages and got it working with
docker pull dalibo/pandocker:latest-ubuntu TAG=latest-ubuntu ./tools/docker/pandoc_makedocs.sh Document
except for the emojis but that's another story :)
Hi @daamien is it also working with the full version? For me it's still failing in the MASVS repo unfortunately
See here
https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-masvs/actions/runs/3292973571/jobs/5448903701
Digest: sha256:9e9af14dc29f5d72ae5b1396a2ba626efcf03677e53e27e32d20a4f81427b210
146
Status: Downloaded newer image for dalibo/pandocker:latest-ubuntu-full
147
Error producing PDF.
148
! LaTeX Error: File `sectsty.sty' not found.
149
150
Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
151
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
152
153
Enter file name:
154
! Emergency stop.
155
<read *>
156
157
l.95 \sectionfont
158
159
Error: Process completed with exit code 43.
Sorry I forgot to update latest-ubuntu-full
It's done now
Thank you @daamien, unfortunately there's still an error, but a different one:
Digest: sha256:30e67e02b345e1fe6becacc43532bb38fc8fbf6de954108def6555893ac42443
Status: Downloaded newer image for dalibo/pandocker:latest-ubuntu-full
Error producing PDF.
! LaTeX Error: Environment RTL undefined.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.198 \begin{RTL}
Error: Process completed with exit code 43.
Hi @cpholguera
I took some time to investigate and it looks like it's a bug in the default latex template delivered with pandoc.
I have opened a ticket on the pandoc project to check it out: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/8460
In the meantime, here's a quick workaround:
tools\docker\latex-header.tex
file:https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-masvs/blob/master/tools/docker/latex-header.tex
%% Workaround for pandoc bug #8460
%% https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/8460
\newenvironment{RTL}{\beginR}{\endR}
Thanks a lot for checking @daamien, I'll try that out!
It works, thanks again @daamien!
Hi @daamien,
the latest release has unfortunately broken our document generation pipeline. We were using "stable" until now and I've tested it now with 22.01 and it works as expected. Since we didn't introduce any changes I assume that something should be wrong in pandocker itself.
Here's the PR I'm using for testing, it includes all the info and links to the failing run and the successful run.
https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-mstg/pull/2092
If you have any suggestions or idea why it's failing please let me know and I'll try it. Before doing a regression in our pipeline I wanted to check it with you first.
Thanks a lot in advance!