Closed pgiraud closed 1 year ago
In the following plan, the on foo doesn't seem to be parsed correctly. It actually doesn't appear in the in the node detail.
on foo
Subquery Scan on foo (cost=0.00..2.27 rows=1 width=265) Filter: (foo.relname = 'aa'::name) -> Limit (cost=0.00..1.77 rows=40 width=265) -> Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..18.10 rows=410 width=265)
[ { "Plan": { "Node Type": "Subquery Scan", "Parallel Aware": false, "Async Capable": false, "Alias": "foo", "Startup Cost": 0.00, "Total Cost": 2.27, "Plan Rows": 1, "Plan Width": 265, "Filter": "(foo.relname = 'aa'::name)", "Plans": [ { "Node Type": "Limit", "Parent Relationship": "Subquery", "Parallel Aware": false, "Async Capable": false, "Startup Cost": 0.00, "Total Cost": 1.77, "Plan Rows": 40, "Plan Width": 265, "Plans": [ { "Node Type": "Seq Scan", "Parent Relationship": "Outer", "Parallel Aware": false, "Async Capable": false, "Relation Name": "pg_class", "Alias": "pg_class", "Startup Cost": 0.00, "Total Cost": 18.10, "Plan Rows": 410, "Plan Width": 265 } ] } ] } } ]
In the following plan, the
on foo
doesn't seem to be parsed correctly. It actually doesn't appear in the in the node detail.