So, I'm using LibLog 5.0.6 and when I set the LIBLOG_EXCLUDE_CODE_COVERAGE conditional compile symbol the LibLogException still appears in the code coverage report.
Also, why do we need to use this conditional compilation symbol? I don't see any reason for this not be the default. Does the clients of LibLog want to test LibLog and have the code coverage?
My suggestion would be to inverse the logic and include the attribute by default, and a symbol could control when not to include it, because i'm sure you want to have code coverage for your own tests.
Hi!
So, I'm using LibLog 5.0.6 and when I set the LIBLOG_EXCLUDE_CODE_COVERAGE conditional compile symbol the LibLogException still appears in the code coverage report.
Also, why do we need to use this conditional compilation symbol? I don't see any reason for this not be the default. Does the clients of LibLog want to test LibLog and have the code coverage? My suggestion would be to inverse the logic and include the attribute by default, and a symbol could control when not to include it, because i'm sure you want to have code coverage for your own tests.
And thanks for this library!