Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
grouping movies by their physical location, which is specified in the config
utility.
And maybe let the user assign an alias to each physical location (to use with
the
UI).
So if I would specify this in the config util:
D:\Movies [alias: HD Movies]
E:\Movies [alias: SD Movies]
I would see this in the UI (if filtered by folder):
- HD Movies (shows all movies in D:\Movies and its sub directories)
- SD Movies (shows all movies in E:\Movies and its sub directories)
Like shares view in MyVideos, but database powered
Original comment by pira...@gmail.com
on 28 Aug 2008 at 1:31
I would like too see a filter for say the 20 latest movies added to db.
Original comment by jorgen.skullestad@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2008 at 8:24
seconded. you could call it "Newly Imported".
would be nice if one could customize this filter range as well. for example:
by number (last N films imported)
by date range (imported within last N weeks or N months)
Original comment by moj...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2008 at 8:27
[deleted comment]
A browsing feature like in the attached file would ease browsing a lot. Maybe
something like this could be implemented?
Original comment by klausm...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2008 at 10:07
Attachments:
Yeah, we'd like to do something like that. Filtering has been pushed back a
little
bit lately, but maybe in another month or so we will look at addressing this.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 10 Oct 2008 at 2:13
Original comment by conrad.john
on 16 Oct 2008 at 3:22
Yeahh we need filters, and search.
and make it work like XBMC, filter is great
and search is even better, as it will search, movie and actor names.. and list
them,
its just great
Original comment by brownghost@gmail.com
on 2 Nov 2008 at 9:20
I note that several people confuse filtering with sorting.
Sorting lists the collection in an order usually determined by a field in the
database, such as "Date Added", "Title", "Genre", "Rating", etc. and will list
the
entire collection. Sorting changes the order of the movies listed but doesn't
reduce
the number of movies listed.
Filtering lists a subset of the collection based on a criteria. Filtering by
itself
doesn't change the order of the movies listed.
So someone wanting to "filter" by Date-Added would get a subset of movies based
on
the filter such as "within the last week". This might be quite a large list
that
still doesn't list the most recently added movie first.
It might be worth reviewing the demand for "filtering" to see how much is
actually
for Sorting and not filtering.
Original comment by Douginoz...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2008 at 2:26
Original comment by conrad.john
on 14 Dec 2008 at 6:22
I would like to be able to filter on custom categories or genres. For
instance, I
would like to filter and display only "kids" movies. I could manually add the
categories via the config tool similar to how mymovies does it.
Original comment by gship...@gmail.com
on 18 Dec 2008 at 2:43
gshipley, your suggestion sounds a lot like tagging:
http://code.google.com/p/moving-pictures/issues/detail?id=14
Original comment by travistx
on 18 Dec 2008 at 3:39
One more vote for a "shares"-like view, just something that will filter the
movies by
location on the HD.
Original comment by victor89@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2008 at 7:40
Issue 259 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 30 Dec 2008 at 5:35
While advanced tagging is addressed in issue 14, an easy way to address this to
start
may be to allow assigning a directory path with a checkbox to the right to
specify SD
or HD.
Original comment by pdo...@gmail.com
on 1 Jan 2009 at 7:49
not everyone filters their movies on their hdds.
maybe use mediainfo.dll to gather resolution info from the files and add those
fields
to the db? then sort by HD (i.e. 720p (or within 10% of that) 1080p (etc))?
Original comment by pgjensen
on 17 Feb 2009 at 3:08
Hi Guys, you probably have already planned this but it would also be nice if you
expose the translated 'Filter Name' to the skin.
See StreamedMP:
http://code.google.com/p/streamedmp/issues/detail?id=116&colspec=ID%20Type%20Sta
tus%20Priority%20Stars%20Milestone%20Owner%20Summary
Original comment by damien.haynes@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2009 at 4:47
What's the latest status of this issue ? I've been using Meedio for my HTPC for
quiet
sometime but after seeing MovingPictures in action I'm planning to switch but
this
particular issue is a cause of concern for me.
My movies are divided into different categories and I would like to have a way
to
filter them out. For example, in Meedio, I have separate library for each type
i.e.
- Kids
- English
- Documentaries
- Music Videos
and selecting a library only displays that type of video.
Original comment by ajam...@yahoo.com
on 15 Apr 2009 at 12:23
Well this is an issue that I am working on but I have been taking a bit of time
off and
been out of town lately. I just got back home and things are settling down so I
should
have time to finish this up in the near future. It will definitely be included
in the
next major release though.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 21 Apr 2009 at 3:49
Awesome, thanks so much!!
Original comment by nickasta...@gmail.com
on 22 Apr 2009 at 3:55
So far, how would this issue/enhancement be implemented? As comment #9 says,
there is
a difference between 'filtering' and 'sorting'. Are both planned within this
issue -
or are these thought to be as two individual issues?
Original comment by joac...@tingvold.com
on 27 May 2009 at 9:50
Sorting is already implemented in 0.7. It's available now. Filtering is coming
in 0.8
and you can read a little bit about what we have planned here:
http://bit.ly/k5rI2
Original comment by conrad.john
on 28 May 2009 at 5:18
The post you are referring to, have 'Recently added' as an example of what the
upcoming 'filter'-feature would be able to do. However, given if we use the
'Added
this week'-filter, would the filtered result be sorted alphabetically, or the
last
added on top, and the first added on the bottom? I'd say the most logical way
would
be the latter, but is this something that the currently implemented 'sorting' in
0.7.0 supports?
Original comment by joac...@tingvold.com
on 28 May 2009 at 6:04
It depends on how you sort it. We are planning on allowing you to specify a
default
sort order attached to a view though, so unless this slips (unlikely) what you
are
describing will be available in 0.8.
Even with the current version though you can sort but Date Added so that newest
movies
are on top, just like you are describing.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 28 May 2009 at 6:09
You can sort by 'Date Added' in the configuration pane in 0.7.0?
Original comment by joac...@tingvold.com
on 28 May 2009 at 7:09
You can sort items in the GUI by Date Added, yes. If you have questions about
this
feature I'd be happy to answer, just jump on the forums, this area is really
meant
for discussion about filtering development.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 28 May 2009 at 7:18
Committed phase 1 of filtering in r646. This includes only advanced filtering
and is
not yet hooked into the GUI. It is attached to the partially implemented
parental
controls functionality though, so if anyone wants to play around with the
advanced
filter interface, you can do so if you build the latest revision. In the config
goto
the GUI Settings tab and see the bottom for Parental Controls settings.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 3 Jun 2009 at 4:32
Hi guys!
What's the status of this issue? Are you going in the right direction? Tell us
something about it please! ;)
Thanks for all your work, you are doing an incredible job!
Original comment by riturr...@gmail.com
on 24 Jul 2009 at 11:19
Brief update for all those who have the issue starred. Filtering is fully
implemented
(although we still need to finalize the default filters when you
upgrade/install).
Parental controls (tangentially related) is pretty much done (although we might
tweak
the black list / white list behavior). Categories (basically a hierarchical
view of
filters, similar to the groups view in tv series) is done on the back end and
functional
on the front end. Although the GUI needs some polish still.
We will most likely be releasing an Alpha this weekend for 0.8. Keep an eye on
the
forums Saturday and Sunday because we will probably be doing a limited time
open
registration for alpha testing for those that are interested. Please no
questions about
this, we will post more details on the forums in a few days.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 6 Aug 2009 at 5:06
Hi - I would like to be able to have 2 different categories and the ability to
choose
which films appear in which and also the ability to lock with a pin code one of
the
categories - but there has to be an option to choose myself which films go into
which
rather than based on a set of rules (like genre, rating etc). Looking forward
to the
next version :-)
Original comment by pureclea...@gmail.com
on 6 Aug 2009 at 5:20
Issue 529 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 9 Sep 2009 at 8:27
How about a filter "Duplicate Movies"? I found that since I have my movies on
different hdds, moving pictures is a very nice way to find duplicates. (scroll
down
the list and search for duplicates). Of course it would be even nicer if I
could just
filter out all the movies that are listed twice (and maybe even delete one via
the
gui? ;)).
Original comment by bgmei...@gmail.com
on 13 Sep 2009 at 10:39
I have compiled from the SVN, V0.8.0 Looks really good. I have one suggestion,
i'm
not sure if this is a SKIN issue or a plugin issue. It would be really nice to
have
an icon view of the categories. An example of icons is located at
http://www.getdropbox.com/gallery/820886/1/Xzeners%20Icons?h=501ab4
I found these icons for a plugin for WMC called mediabrowser. I'm just
wondering if
we might need another field in the category setup to specify an icon.
Original comment by ct...@tmctech.com
on 17 Sep 2009 at 5:15
Original comment by conrad.john
on 7 Oct 2009 at 6:58
Congrats!!
Original comment by Andrew.W...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2009 at 7:00
Retagged the version number for this issue. This is not a rescheduling, we
are just changing our version number scale.
Original comment by conrad.john
on 29 Nov 2009 at 8:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
conrad.john
on 24 Aug 2008 at 7:43