First, in the example, the last bullet point is not consistent with the first two.
Second, the add does not mention clearly the g/[GROUP] command when add a new person.
The app allows multiple g/ when add a new person, but only takes the first g/ and ignore the rest g/. e.g the first group name is not existed, it will take the second group name if the second one is a valid group name.
Such restriction should be mentioned clearly in the UG for user to follow the command rather than let the user to trial and error the command.
[original: Yiheng0410/pe#3]
Team's Response
The duplicated bullet point is accepted, but the second point has been explained in the following section in the UG:
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Information not enough about add command in the UG.
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
1, dose not mention what fields are compulsory/optional.
2, dose not mention the order of each filed is not fixed.
3, dose not explain the g/GROUP command clearly. e.g. if multiple groups is allowed? what happens if user enter mutile g/GROUP commands.
[destination:
nus-tic4002-AY2021S2/pe-moderation
assignee:boydanderson
labels:response.Rejected
severity.Low
team.3
tutorial.TIC4002-F18
type.DocumentationBug
duplicate
pending.0
]Summary of items to check:
Nothing to check :-)
Issue Description
First, in the example, the last bullet point is not consistent with the first two.
Second, the add does not mention clearly the g/[GROUP] command when add a new person.
The app allows multiple g/ when add a new person, but only takes the first g/ and ignore the rest g/. e.g the first group name is not existed, it will take the second group name if the second one is a valid group name.
Such restriction should be mentioned clearly in the UG for user to follow the command rather than let the user to trial and error the command.
[original: Yiheng0410/pe#3]
Team's Response
The duplicated bullet point is accepted, but the second point has been explained in the following section in the UG:
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
To Check [0 Items]
Nothing to check :-)