add command in the UG

[nus-pe-bot]

[destination: nus-tic4002-AY2021S2/pe-moderation assignee: boydanderson labels: response.Rejected severity.Low team.3 tutorial.TIC4002-F18 type.DocumentationBug duplicate pending.0]

Summary of items to check:

Nothing to check :-)

---

---

Issue Description

First, in the example, the last bullet point is not consistent with the first two.

Second, the add does not mention clearly the g/[GROUP] command when add a new person.

The app allows multiple g/ when add a new person, but only takes the first g/ and ignore the rest g/. e.g the first group name is not existed, it will take the second group name if the second one is a valid group name.

Such restriction should be mentioned clearly in the UG for user to follow the command rather than let the user to trial and error the command.

---

_{[original: Yiheng0410/pe#3]}

Team's Response

The duplicated bullet point is accepted, but the second point has been explained in the following section in the UG:

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Information not enough about add command in the UG.

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

1, dose not mention what fields are compulsory/optional. 2, dose not mention the order of each filed is not fixed. 3, dose not explain the g/GROUP command clearly. e.g. if multiple groups is allowed? what happens if user enter mutile g/GROUP commands.

---

_{[original: nus-tic4002-AY2021S2/pe-interim#17] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

The add command format has been following the "Notes about the command format" as shown below:

To Check [0 Items]

Nothing to check :-)

[soc-se-bot-blue]

The formatting seems to be correct

[soc-se-bot-blue]

Stale issue. Close?