Open damonkohler opened 9 years ago
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
Which device are you talking about?
Original comment by naranjo....@gmail.com
on 23 May 2011 at 2:16
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
[deleted comment]
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
IOIO
Original comment by rice103
on 23 May 2011 at 2:25
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
You mean this board: http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10585 ? Get me one and I
do it ;)
Original comment by naranjo....@gmail.com
on 23 May 2011 at 3:25
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
Yeah! exactly!
Original comment by rice103
on 23 May 2011 at 3:29
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
I think IOIO will support open accessory api soon(I could be wrong). So I think
it is better that SL4A support the open accessory api.
Original comment by swees...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2011 at 3:10
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
Problem with the Open Accessory API is that it requires Gingerbread (2.3) and
AFAIK none of the core developers have any device with it. I wouldn't mind in
getting a 2.3 device as a donation to the proect ;) with an IOIO and/or Open
Accessory API board for implementing this :-)
Original comment by naranjo....@gmail.com
on 26 May 2011 at 11:43
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
IOIO it uses a very simple library to interface with many devices and requires
an Android 1.5! So why do not you create an implementation with sl4a?
Original comment by rice103
on 26 May 2011 at 12:22
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
I like the IOIO idea, but again I have not even a single board, so I can't test
it!
Original comment by naranjo....@gmail.com
on 26 May 2011 at 12:47
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
Original comment by rjmatthews62
on 17 Aug 2011 at 2:24
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
At this point, there isn't a lot of impetus to include IOIO into SL4a.
Mainly concerned about code bloat, for a product only a few people are likely
to use.
If there is more demand, and/or someone can provide the loan of an actual IOIO
board, we may revisit this.
However, I took the time to look at the source code for the IOIO Java library.
It communicates with the card via TCP, which mean you could easily write a
Python (or whatever) binding for the IOIO library, and the code would be not be
taking up space in the sl4a API.
Original comment by rjmatthews62
on 22 Aug 2011 at 12:06
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
I'd absolutely love to be able to communicate with an IOIO from sl4a, but I
have no clue how I'd go about writing such a binding. Is anyone else working on
this? What would I need to know about to do this myself?
Original comment by philipp....@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2011 at 8:53
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
You can join the ioio-dev group and start a technical discussion there. I can
help with technical questions.
Ytai
Original comment by yta...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2011 at 5:15
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
Any news about this issue ? Is it now possible to use IOIO board from Py4a ?
Original comment by sebastie...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2012 at 8:53
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
I'm still waiting any news about this issue. It would be great if we can
communicate IOIO board with Android through sl4a.
Original comment by ilham.me...@gmail.com
on 7 Dec 2012 at 6:28
From @GoogleCodeExporter on May 31, 2015 11:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rice103
on 20 May 2011 at 7:54Copied from original issue: damonkohler/android-scripting#546