Closed sythel closed 4 years ago
waiting on approval of style changes in PR #103
@elbfox if you want a different basemap for the interactive map these are the choices:
http://leaflet-extras.github.io/leaflet-providers/preview/index.html
This is really nice (I like the Mapnik version), but the issue for me is that if we use this map in the beginning, we would want a map like this for results for consistency. Our results map is from a static dataset that Sam created specific to the MOGA output, which is something we're running prior to use. Can we put the base map question on hold until we get the WSM with results graphs/figures sorted?
Or am I not understanding the question?
no problem, we can wait.
Is the map in step 2 something we can replicate for step 4 in the no-MOGA version with dot colors coordinated to the top decision alternative at each dam? Like if we brought in the map recommendation tab (which I had removed entirely) and instead of a static map pulled from a folder had the dots for each dam site coordinate to the colors in those multi-dam maps, where green = keep maintain, black = remove, yellow = improve fish passage, red = improve both fish passage and hydro, and blue = improve hydro?
UX/UI for map on-hover labels