dams-mcda / Dams-MCDA

Emma Fox R/Shiny Project with a docker server configuration
1 stars 0 forks source link

map label style #102

Closed sythel closed 4 years ago

sythel commented 5 years ago

UX/UI for map on-hover labels

sythel commented 5 years ago

waiting on approval of style changes in PR #103

sythel commented 5 years ago

@elbfox if you want a different basemap for the interactive map these are the choices:

http://leaflet-extras.github.io/leaflet-providers/preview/index.html

elbfox commented 5 years ago

This is really nice (I like the Mapnik version), but the issue for me is that if we use this map in the beginning, we would want a map like this for results for consistency. Our results map is from a static dataset that Sam created specific to the MOGA output, which is something we're running prior to use. Can we put the base map question on hold until we get the WSM with results graphs/figures sorted?

Or am I not understanding the question?

sythel commented 5 years ago

no problem, we can wait.

elbfox commented 4 years ago

Is the map in step 2 something we can replicate for step 4 in the no-MOGA version with dot colors coordinated to the top decision alternative at each dam? Like if we brought in the map recommendation tab (which I had removed entirely) and instead of a static map pulled from a folder had the dots for each dam site coordinate to the colors in those multi-dam maps, where green = keep maintain, black = remove, yellow = improve fish passage, red = improve both fish passage and hydro, and blue = improve hydro?