Closed jjnesbitt closed 1 week ago
One note: I didn't realize that we prohibit publishing of embargoed Dandisets. I wonder if we should consider lifting that ban--I can see why it would be useful to be able to do so, though the wording we're using makes it confusing ("it's embargoed... how can I be publishing this?") when really "publish" mostly means to create an immutable snapshot.
I thought it was a hard requirement that published dandisets be open access, from more of a NIH policy standpoint.
I thought it was a hard requirement that published dandisets be open access, from more of a NIH policy standpoint.
yes, embargoed dandisets should not receive a published doi. publishing is only for non-embargoed dandisets.
in the future we may publish restricted dandisets, but we haven't implemented that yet.
to speak about roni's point of freezing versions on embargoed data, that's a different feature which we don't have. we should discuss whether that feature should even exist.
@waxlamp I had forgotten to include uploads as a part of the locking, as well as prohibit un-embargo in the first place if there were active uploads. Commits ef7c530 and b789645 cover that.
This change will help prevent race conditions that could arise if modifications are allowed while un-embargo is ongoing.