codecov[bot]
commented
8 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
c674cd6) 97.38% compared to head (e3a993e) 97.61%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #199 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 97.38% 97.61% +0.22% ========================================== Files 17 17 Lines 1759 1760 +1 ========================================== + Hits 1713 1718 +5 + Misses 46 42 -4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/199/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/199/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi) | `97.61% <100.00%> (+0.22%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/199?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [dandischema/tests/test\_datacite.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/199?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi#diff-ZGFuZGlzY2hlbWEvdGVzdHMvdGVzdF9kYXRhY2l0ZS5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | ... and [1 file with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/199/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
It frequently happens that a CI run fails because one instance of
test_dandimeta_dataciteon one platform got a 422 error. The evidence suggests that this a problem on datacite's end, so this PR causes the test to simply be retried a few times until it succeeds.