codecov[bot]
commented
5 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
dbd704a) 97.66% compared to head (b8dfbec) 91.99%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #221 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 97.66% 91.99% -5.68% ========================================== Files 18 18 Lines 1799 1798 -1 ========================================== - Hits 1757 1654 -103 - Misses 42 144 +102 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/221/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dandi/dandi-schema/pull/221/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi) | `91.99% <ø> (-5.68%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dandi#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Applying a mark to a fixture function never had any affect. It now issues a warning in Pytest V8 and will raise an error in the future version of Pytest. For details, please check out https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/deprecations.html#applying-a-mark-to-a-fixture-function.
Merging this PR is necessary for future PRs to pass the needed tests.