Closed xiaoyan07 closed 10 months ago
I guess the possible reason is about the version: you can try the torch 2.0.0 with Python 2.8.2. We checked and it works on our server.
Xiaoyan Lu @.***> 于2023年12月24日周日 17:20写道:
Hi, Prof. Hong:
Thanks for your great work and contribution, I recently run the original code: Train_HighDAN_beijing.py with the default parameter. The changing trend of mIoU is as follows, and I couldn't get the mIoU: 11.92% in the RSE paper. I wonder if some of the parameters in the training file are different from the ones you actually use?Can you share your trained model weights? Thank you so much, and look forward to your reply. miou_score.jpg (view on web) https://github.com/danfenghong/RSE_Cross-city/assets/35627108/f07580e4-aa9a-4220-ab16-ec16bbc9121b
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/danfenghong/RSE_Cross-city/issues/1, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFL2GZR7SSCKNTAZJDVPGG3YK7XU7AVCNFSM6AAAAABBBMZCBCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGA2TKMBTHA4DQMY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi, Prof. Hong:
Thanks for your great work and contribution, I recently run the original code: Train_HighDAN_beijing.py with the default parameter. The changing trend of mIoU is as follows, and I couldn't get the mIoU: 11.92% in the RSE paper. I wonder if some of the parameters in the training file are different from the ones you actually use?Can you share your trained model weights? Thank you so much, and look forward to your reply.
We have updated the pretraining weights we used in the paper.
I guess the possible reason is about the version: you can try the torch 2.0.0 with Python 2.8.2. We checked and it works on our server. Xiaoyan Lu @.> 于2023年12月24日周日 17:20写道: … Hi, Prof. Hong: Thanks for your great work and contribution, I recently run the original code: Train_HighDAN_beijing.py with the default parameter. The changing trend of mIoU is as follows, and I couldn't get the mIoU: 11.92% in the RSE paper. I wonder if some of the parameters in the training file are different from the ones you actually use?Can you share your trained model weights? Thank you so much, and look forward to your reply. miou_score.jpg (view on web) https://github.com/danfenghong/RSE_Cross-city/assets/35627108/f07580e4-aa9a-4220-ab16-ec16bbc9121b — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFL2GZR7SSCKNTAZJDVPGG3YK7XU7AVCNFSM6AAAAABBBMZCBCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGA2TKMBTHA4DQMY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.>
Thanks to Prof. Hong's and Xuaner's advice and patience, after adjusting the batch size to 16 (which is the same as in the paper) and searching for the best weights epoch by epoch, the result is much improved and very close to the paper.
Hi, Prof. Hong:
Thanks for your great work and contribution, I recently run the original code: Train_HighDAN_beijing.py with the default parameter. The changing trend of mIoU is as follows, and I couldn't get the mIoU: 11.92% in the RSE paper. I wonder if some of the parameters in the training file are different from the ones you actually use?Can you share your trained model weights? Thank you so much, and look forward to your reply.