Closed jauderho closed 1 year ago
Actually, should the image be ubuntu instead given that the actual workflow currently uses ubuntu-latest
? Using ubuntu results in an image about the same size as bullseye-slim.
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
owrt-ubuntu latest aaf239b4988a 2 minutes ago 1.02GB
owrt latest e63400b3f114 13 minutes ago 1.11GB
owrt-slim latest 6fae00390136 22 minutes ago 1.01GB
I'd rather have the workflow changed to also run on debian/bullseye-slim
...
AFAIK, GitHub Actions only run on Ubuntu, macOS and Windows.
AFAIK, GitHub Actions only run on Ubuntu, macOS and Windows. That's sad. But ok, I'm not complaining about having CI resources thrown at me for free.
Let's use Ubuntu for the Containerfile as well then, like you suggested.
I've updated the PR and also changed the workflow to use ubuntu-22.04
instead of ubuntu-latest
to match.
Using bullseye-slim instead of bullseye saves about 100MB in the resulting image. Not huge but every little bit helps.