Closed IndrajeetPatil closed 3 years ago
Thanks for the suggestion! I will consider this. Maybe it is possible to push a new version of the package to CRAN before Christmas.
Cool, thanks for being open to this possibility :)
Do you this is a temporary error with the patched version? https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_metaBMA.html
The error seems to have disappeared already (2020-12-01 23:48:32 CET) - maybe this was an issue with CRAN?
@danheck Do you think this can now be done some time in January?
I am planning to have my next package release cycle then, and I'd like to do it after metaBMA
defaults have changed.
@IndrajeetPatil I just uploaded a version 0.6.6 with new default priors to CRAN.
Thanks, Daniel!
If revdepcheck
flags any of my packages for failing tests, just let the CRAN
people know that you have already informed the maintainer and the necessary changes have been made.
Perfect, thanks!
Context: https://github.com/easystats/parameters/issues/347#issuecomment-732931589
Maybe also leave out the internal numbers
rscale_contin
andrscale_discrete
to avoid this confusion? At least until the moderator analysis is implemented.Will you be open to having another quick release with these changes in the near future (pre-Christmas)?