User Story: As a user, I want to use the Review interface to response to published papers, so that I can annotate papers as part of my response.
Story Description and Background
What are we trying to accomplish? What context do we need to know?
We need to enable users to use the Review interface to post responses. Those responses should still include an endorsement or refutement, but should allow the paper to be annotated just as with the pre-publish reviews. We should be able to reuse most of the review infrastructure. One way to accomplish this might be to add a "Version of Record" version during the publish action and then allow post publish reviews to posted to that version. We could mark that version as "published" and then offer endorsement or refutement in place of review recommendation for reviews on a published version.
Acceptance Criteria
At what point is this story considered "done"?
Responses use the same interface as pre-publish review, allowing annotation of the paper with comments.
Responses still allow the user to "endorse" or "refute" the paper.
User Story: As a user, I want to use the Review interface to response to published papers, so that I can annotate papers as part of my response.
Story Description and Background
What are we trying to accomplish? What context do we need to know?
We need to enable users to use the Review interface to post responses. Those responses should still include an endorsement or refutement, but should allow the paper to be annotated just as with the pre-publish reviews. We should be able to reuse most of the review infrastructure. One way to accomplish this might be to add a "Version of Record" version during the publish action and then allow post publish reviews to posted to that version. We could mark that version as "published" and then offer endorsement or refutement in place of review recommendation for reviews on a published version.
Acceptance Criteria
At what point is this story considered "done"?
Dependencies
What stories does this one depend on?