Closed Bordovsky closed 1 year ago
I am wondering if the pound sign (#) is necessary for some reason, but if not, I would suggest to remove it from the schema_version validation.
As far as I can tell, the identifier for Draft 7 is always given as "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", as attested to by a google search on "json-schema.org/draft-07/schema". Earlier versions followed a similar convention, later versions starting with 2019-09 dropped the # and substituted https. See https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/UnderstandingJSONSchema.pdf
Thanks for the reference. I should have searched more thoughtfully and not trust our old schemas.
You are right and I have even found identifiers for each draft and the #
is listed there.
I am closing this now.
Hi,
I am trying to use jsoncons for json document validation, and I stumbled upon an odd behaviour around URI for schema.
It looks like jsoncons/jsonschema requires the schema URI to contain a fragment.
When browsing jsonschema examples the
schema URI
is provided with an empty fragment. It is legal for URI to contain an empty fragment, but it is a bit unusual (and semantically redundant).As far as I was able to find at json-schema.org it seems that the URI should/could be provided without any fragment, but current validation does not accept such URI.
I am wondering if the pound sign (#) is necessary for some reason, but if not, I would suggest to remove it from the schema_version validation.