Closed danielealbano closed 1 year ago
liblzf uses an obscene amount of stack to compress the data, about 1mb, meanwhile cachegrand uses about 40kb for its own fibers.
There are two options:
Further investigation is required
Will implement the second option as it's the ones the makes most sense
When generating the RDB snapshots, if strings are compressed with liblzf using the LZF algorithm, cachegrand crashes with a segfault.
The crash needs to be investigated.