S3Contents is a good candidate for Docker, as it doesn't need access to local data. I created a draft version of a Dockerfile, if you like the idea it's ready to be merged :)
Coverage remained the same at 88.626% when pulling d9027350c327ca03e6bfb17c10f329fca90687f4 on MatthieuBizien:dockerfile into de3fb04971eddd4ad5073725658d7ad8886450c4 on danielfrg:master.
S3Contents is a good candidate for Docker, as it doesn't need access to local data. I created a draft version of a Dockerfile, if you like the idea it's ready to be merged :)