search

danielgerlag / workflow-core

Lightweight workflow engine for .NET Standard
MIT License
5.36k stars 1.2k forks source link

why is the source code for workfllow netstandard2.0. that standard is obsolete and .net 5 is the now standard #728

Closed stevensrf11 closed 3 years ago

stevensrf11 commented 3 years ago

Why is the source code for workfllow netstandard 2.0 when .net 5 is now the stanadard? netstandard2.0 is obsolete at least the source code should be netstandard 3.0 I guess that shown this source code is obsolete and worthless

ssougnez commented 3 years ago

What a stupid statement. The code targets .net standard 2.0 in order to be usable in a large amount of application... You should test the library and check the release before telling stuff like this.

Wfcore is an awesome library up to date.

danielgerlag commented 3 years ago

@stevensrf11 as a library, we target the lowest .net standard version in order to maximize the number of applications that could use it... those applications can use any implementation such as .net 5 or .net core 3 or .net framework 4.6, etc... which implements the API surface defined by netstandard 2.0. There is no netstandard 3.0

Please see the Microsoft docs for more info and guidance on when to target which version

stevensrf11 commented 3 years ago

The why is the source code using .Net Standard 2.0?

   

Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 7:17 PM From: "Daniel Gerlag" notifications@github.com To: "danielgerlag/workflow-core" workflow-core@noreply.github.com Cc: "stevensrf11" stevensrf@mail.com, "Mention" mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [danielgerlag/workflow-core] why is the source code for workfllow netstandard2.0. that standard is obsolete and .net 5 is the now standard (#728)

 

@stevensrf11 as a library, we target the lowest .net standard version in order to maximize the number of applications that could use it... those applications can use any implementation such as .net 5 or .net core 3 or .net framework 4.6, etc... which implements the API surface defined by netstandard 2.0. There is no netstandard 3.0

Please see the Microsoft docs for more info and guidance on when to target which version - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standard

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

stevensrf11 commented 3 years ago

What a stupid person to say this is a stupid statement

   

Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 2:41 PM From: "Sébastien Sougnez" notifications@github.com To: "danielgerlag/workflow-core" workflow-core@noreply.github.com Cc: "stevensrf11" stevensrf@mail.com, "Author" author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [danielgerlag/workflow-core] why is the source code for workfllow netstandard2.0. that standard is obsolete and .net 5 is the now standard (#728)

 

What a stupid statement. The code targets .net standard 2.0 in order to be usable in a large amount of application... You should test the library and check the release before telling stuff like this.

Wfcore is an awesome library up to date.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

sandord commented 3 years ago

Guys, please be kind to each other and refrain from making toxic remarks. Most of us are dependent on open source projects like this and the people spending their free time to work and contribute on open source projects deserve a respectful environment.

stevensrf11 commented 3 years ago

ROFL I was being kind

   

Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at 5:27 AM From: "Sandor Drieënhuizen" notifications@github.com To: "danielgerlag/workflow-core" workflow-core@noreply.github.com Cc: "stevensrf11" stevensrf@mail.com, "Mention" mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [danielgerlag/workflow-core] why is the source code for workfllow netstandard2.0. that standard is obsolete and .net 5 is the now standard (#728)

 

Guys, please be kind to each other and refrain from making toxic remarks. Most of us are dependent on open source projects like this and the people spending their free time to work and contribute on open source projects deserve a respectful environment.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.