Closed danielgtaylor closed 3 weeks ago
[!CAUTION]
Review failed
The pull request is closed.
The recent changes to the Register
function enhance buffer lifecycle management by ensuring that buffers are reset before being returned to the pool. This adjustment mitigates potential race conditions and improves memory management, thereby increasing the robustness of the codebase.
Files | Change Summary |
---|---|
huma.go | Moved buffer return to pool after buffer reset to prevent misuse. |
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant BufferPool
Client->>Server: Send Request with Buffer
Server->>BufferPool: Get Buffer
Server->>Buffer: Use Buffer
Server->>Buffer: Reset Buffer
Server->>BufferPool: Return Buffer
BufferPool-->>Server: Buffer Returned
Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Race condition detected in Huma v2.22.0 (#552) | ✅ |
🐰 In the garden where buffers play,
I hop and reset them every day!
A jump to the pool, so fresh and bright,
Keeping things safe, oh what a delight!
Memory managed, so clever and neat,
In code we trust, with no bugs to greet! 🌼
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 92.76%. Comparing base (
e1ffc73
) to head (731da9e
). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This fixes an order-of-operations bug that was due to copy/paste and removal of
defer
statements, however defers execute in reverse order while the copied statements execute in order. This means the buffer could be sent back into the pool before getting reset, causing a potential race on the next read. This was a silly mistake that should have been caught with the race detector during tests but was unfortunately missed. Sorry about that!Fixes #552
Summary by CodeRabbit