search

danieljjh / oppia

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/oppia
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Have interaction options be embedded, instead of the options opening in a new window. #758

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
In as much detail as possible, please describe what you would like to see.

1. Currently after you write a state, you click a button that says +Interaction
2. The term "Interaction" is not clear. However, the interactions themselves 
Are clear and generally self-explanatory because of their visual nature.
3. Instead of having to click the "+Interaction" button, simply embed the 
interaction options right there in the page. 
4. That way 1) you won't have to think of a better term for "Interaction", 2) 
it's one less click for creators, and 3) the options are right there in front 
of them.

What operating system are you using?
Yosemite 10.10.3

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sba...@google.com on 15 May 2015 at 9:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
+Amy, Amit

Amy, how does this compare with your usability testing?

I think point (4)(1) is moot since we'll need to have the term 'interaction' 
anyway, since there's the "customize interaction" dialog. (4)(2) is true but I 
think that (4)(3) might make the UI look too complicated. Thoughts welcome!

Original comment by s...@google.com on 15 May 2015 at 11:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I'd be interested to see if this comes up again. The reason we pushed for there 
to be a button that says interaction was to force the user to enter content in 
the state above, and THEN choose to add the interaction. By embedding it in the 
UI underneath the content box, we'd confuse the user with too many actions at 
once, in my opinion and from what I've seen with user testing.

What do you think Amit?

Original comment by amylat...@google.com on 18 May 2015 at 6:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Sean & Amy that's a great point about too much being on one page if it were 
embedded. I see why you did it like that. Like Amy said, it would be 
interesting to see if it comes up again.

Original comment by sba...@google.com on 18 May 2015 at 9:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I agree with what Amy said, but I also agree that it would be important to 
address this if it came up again. Closing for now, but please feel free to 
reopen this thread again if other authors run into this.

Original comment by amitdeut...@google.com on 20 May 2015 at 10:19