please make it clear in the description

[Seabizkit]

is low better or worse, its not clear

as the graphs contradict the results then

Unity 5.11.10
 | 216 148 | 1443 835 | 3326 1995 | 9503 4739

Microsoft Extensions DependencyInjection 6.0.0 
| 65 57 | 108 82 | 108  109 | 150  115

This would indicate that the Microsoft Extensions DependencyInjection is faster yes?

but then in the graphs it shows it like how many instances were created over time

https://danielpalme.github.io/IocPerformance/

So then actually Unity is faster...

[danielpalme]

is low better or worse, its not clear

All measurements represent execution time (how long does the container need to resolve 100.000 instances of a given type). So lower is better.

This would indicate that the Microsoft Extensions DependencyInjection is faster yes?

Correct.

but then in the graphs it shows it like how many instances were created over time

No, the graphs also show the execution time. The x-axis has a logarithmic scale.

So then actually Unity is faster... No, its slower.

[Seabizkit]

ok thanks!, its not clear what the y axis is to me then, its should say (time in milliseconds or nano secs) I assumed it was number of operations able to complete in over a period of time. its just when things are mirco benchmarked this normally like x amount of completions in given time. how many operations you complete in a given time period. like requests per second kind of thing... But seems kinda* obvious now, but thanks for the excellent explanation.

[Seabizkit]

maybe add something which states "low is better"