Closed andrew-w-ross closed 2 years ago
@andrew-w-ross Only possible strange aspect about this solution (purely from a semantic point of view) is the name of the utility being isGraphQLDocument
. With it also checking the schema(s), I feel like a less specific name might be better now, or splitting the schema match check into its own separate utility.
Just spitballing names, I could see isGraphQLFile
or isGraphQLRelated
or something along those lines. Not the biggest fan of either idea so I'm open to other options!
Also before merge I think this commit name should also follow the conventional commit format, not sure if this falls into a fix:
or a feat:
, but either way we'll need it to release it!
Appreciate your contributions a lot!
:tada: This PR is included in version 2.1.0 :tada:
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
Closes #7