Closed harshakokel closed 4 years ago
Hi, thanks for your message.
Sorry about the confusion. Since the attacker is trying to maximize the classification loss, Algorithm 1 is correct and in the paper it should read L_atk=L_self
. Let me know if that helps!
Best,
Daniel
Thank you. This helps.
Hello,
I am confused about the loss function in the paper Zuegner et al ICLR 2019.
In the paper, you mention that or and then gradient is
But, in the algorithm the gradient equation is missing the -ve sign.
I am also confused about the same thing in the code. For 'Meta-Train' variant, I think the gradient calculation here is trying to minimize the classification error of the examples in the training here, instead of trying to maximize the classification error.
What am I missing?