Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
detect "on install" is not easy
i prefer to set a default password at the moment
Original comment by pierredu...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2010 at 6:42
Hi,
from the usability point of view I don't see any improvement. It will be
barrier for normal (BFU) users.
Security? It is not so huge issue in this case, isn't it?
IMHO this should be closed.
Do you have any arguments, fuutott?
Original comment by milan.jaros
on 5 May 2010 at 6:24
Would it be possible to generate a password on first run, and save it to the
registry?
Would you like your accountant to have this installed so someone could browse
around
their pc? Or your bank manager?
With a default password this should be considered a backdoor/trojan horse.
Original comment by fuut...@gmail.com
on 5 May 2010 at 7:05
Hmmm.
Ad generate pass) I don't think this is easy to implement. Maybe there could be
first
connection with some default password or without and then server and client
could
talk about password they will use (three way handshake).
I'm not sure with examples you provided. I'll think about it and share my point
of
view then.
You can install that soft to your accountant/manager/etc. and set the password.
It is not easy to store this password safely. Note the server is multi-platform.
Thank you for your comments. ;)
I'm looking forward to next dialogue,
Milan
Original comment by milan.jaros
on 5 May 2010 at 7:37
i agree that a default password is a security concern.
both ideas i believe could work:
1. on app first run, require a 'default' password to be entered. on server
install, require a 'default' password to be entered.
2. keep the default password as it is, force the client/server to determine (on
their own) a new password that is unique to the hardware/network/connection
being used...then keep all of the rest the same for setting a new password, and
creating a profile.
very much interested in this being implemented.
Original comment by dusth...@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2010 at 3:31
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fuut...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2010 at 7:58