Closed dankelley closed 1 year ago
I'm going to try doing as at https://github.com/jonesor/mpmsim/commit/e8d0f0d657ffa24c25ddd3165c7ddcad16322e3d, and resubmitting to CRAN. The test seems to be that
package?plan
works.
The thing is, the CRAN tests are not suggesting a problem, so I don't know how to tell whether this is a fix that (a) will work now and (b) is recommended. I've searched a bit on the web for advice on best practices but not found anything that feels definitive.
I've submitted to CRAN. Since it's a tiny package, I suspect it will go through the pipeline quickly, once it gets to the top of the queue.
To be explicit, for my other packages that have the same problem, the fix is change e.g.
#' Plan, a package for project planning
#'
#' This package provides tools for project planning, e.g. burndown charts,
#' gantt diagrams, etc.; see [burndown-class] and
#' [gantt-class] for entries to the documentation.
#'
#' @name plan
#' @docType package
#' @author Dan Kelley
NULL
to the following. (Note that the usethis
comments are likely not required since I don't use that pacage. Still, I did this just in case Roxygen2 starts needing these lines in future.)
#' Plan, a package for project planning
#'
#' This package provides tools for project planning, e.g. burndown charts,
#' gantt diagrams, etc.; see [burndown-class] and
#' [gantt-class] for entries to the documentation.
#'
#' @name plan
#' @docType package
#' @author Dan Kelley
#' @keywords internal
"_PACKAGE"
## usethis namespace: start
## usethis namespace: end
NULL
On CRAN now
I got as below for this and all the R packages that I maintain. I'll fix this up sometime today, likely starting with another package (
plan
) which is tiny and which will therefore go through tests quickly.