improve rating sorting so trinkets are positioned correctly

[danreeves]

instead of sorting by absolute rating we should sort by percent difference from a max roll

[Coconutcoo]

When we say max roll, do we want to look at the total on the item, or the total on the "most useful" section? E.g. for weapons, most people don't care about max roll at all (since blessings, eventually, can be combined to bump that up), but obviously on curios max roll and blessings/perks are synonymous.

I'm also not 100% sure what the max rolls actually are. Obviously for modifiers it's 380, for blessings I believe it's 45*no. of blessings (10 per tier, max tier 4, plus the bonus 5 for a tier 4). For perks, 25*no. of perks?

If that logic is right, then does the following all seem correct to you? Weapons (Assuming VI follows the logic and adds a 3rd perk - seems likely)	Tier	Total	Modifiers	Blessings	Perks	Bonus
I	380	380	0	0	-
II	410	380	0	25	5
III	455	380	45	25	5
IV	485	380	45	50	10
V	530	380	90	50	10
VI	560	380	90	75	15

Curios (Have not guessed at VI, since it aught to add either a 4th perk or a 2nd blessing)	Tier	Total	Blessings	Perks	Bonus
I	-	-	-	-
II	80	80	0	-
III	110	80	25	5
IV	140	80	50	10
V	170	80	75	15
VI	--	--	--	--

[danreeves]

That all seems right to me but I think we probably only care about comparing it to the max value of the max rarity

[Coconutcoo]

After a discussion on Discord, 155 is not the Curio max, it seems there's also a +5 bonus for T4 perks. I've updated the table with the bonus +5/perk.