Closed jmlee337 closed 3 years ago
Thank you, that must have been an oversight when I restructured the binary directories.
Looking at the file, my preference would be to remove this check entirely, and then increase the verbosity of the IOError
right below it to include the full file path instead of just name
. This first check is both redundant and misleading in comparison, because no OS is "unsupported" as long as the user can supply the required binaries.
done
this allows ASM compilation to succeed on Windows (at least on my machine, otherwise I see
Error compiling ASM: "'Windows' os is not supported"
)