Migrating to Organization Repo

[hunterowens]

So, basically, shit got crazy- this project now has [as of this writing] 432 stars and 108 forks.

In order to keep up participation on open source taco related projects (ie, issue #94), we should probably consolidate all taco related repos into one organization.

@evz / @meetar.

[dansinker]

I believe @santheo has created a tacofancy organization.

[evz]

What's the cleanest way of doing this? Transfer ownership of the projects?

[dansinker]

This is far, far outside my Github knowledge.

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Eric van Zanten notifications@github.comwrote:

What's the cleanest way of doing this? Transfer ownership of the projects?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sinker/tacofancy/issues/98#issuecomment-28418483 .

[hunterowens]

Transfer ownership or fork into the organization are the two options. 1 is better.

-Hunter

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:09 PM, sinker notifications@github.com wrote:

This is far, far outside my Github knowledge.

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Eric van Zanten notifications@github.comwrote:

What's the cleanest way of doing this? Transfer ownership of the projects?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sinker/tacofancy/issues/98#issuecomment-28418483> .

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sinker/tacofancy/issues/98#issuecomment-28418562 .

[raed667]

Let the organisation fork-it, and post a note of the change on the read-me . nice, clean, standard

[dansinker]

problem with forking into the organization is that this URL is out there if we transfer vs fork it will redirect, right?

[knowtheory]

Github redirects old repo url to new repo url when a repo is transferred.

[evz]

I like the idea of transferring. However, looks like whoever owns the repo has to have admin access to the org: https://help.github.com/articles/how-to-transfer-a-repository

Who started the org? @santheo?