search

danzel / PatchworkSim

Simulation of the board game Patchwork for AI exploration
2 stars 0 forks source link

Use Exhaustive as a preplacer #27

Closed danzel closed 6 years ago

danzel commented 6 years ago

ExhaustiveMostFuturePlacements currently performs better than MCTSPreplace with the Tight placement preplacer.

We should be able to use MCTSPreplace with Exhaustive as the preplacer, which might perform better than both?

danzel commented 6 years ago

Implemented.

Current results (With depth 3 vs 1_6 exhaustive): https://gist.github.com/danzel/3ab37feaf357228c65d5ec855aef415d

Run 4 and 45 are not draws, but one AI wins each, so overall draw!

danzel commented 6 years ago

Took a look at the placement differences compared to 1_6, I think the mistakes are now that MCTS is suggesting we are going to buy pieces we aren't going to be able to place.