I "excluded" the PAP entitled, "Development of the BSWM's Competency-Based Framework/Model and Installation of Integrated HR Information System (HRIS) for Civil Service Commission Program to Institutionalize Meritocracy and Excellence in Human Resource Management (CSC PRIME-HRM) Accreditation":
But in the dashboard of the OU itself, there's no indication that this was "excluded" by the TechSec/ IP reviewer. It still shows "For inclusion". Request that there's another marker to signify its "action recommended" status, for reference of the OUs. We can retain the "for inclusion" marker (so it can be documented that the OU submitted the PAP for inclusion); but perhaps we can add another marker below it showing "For exclusion - IPD Staff"?
I "excluded" the PAP entitled, "Development of the BSWM's Competency-Based Framework/Model and Installation of Integrated HR Information System (HRIS) for Civil Service Commission Program to Institutionalize Meritocracy and Excellence in Human Resource Management (CSC PRIME-HRM) Accreditation":
But in the dashboard of the OU itself, there's no indication that this was "excluded" by the TechSec/ IP reviewer. It still shows "For inclusion". Request that there's another marker to signify its "action recommended" status, for reference of the OUs. We can retain the "for inclusion" marker (so it can be documented that the OU submitted the PAP for inclusion); but perhaps we can add another marker below it showing "For exclusion - IPD Staff"?
...or perhaps another color?