Open r001 opened 7 years ago
To clarify: this is to future proof ds-proxy against gas pricing changes in the EVM.
@gbalabasquer @NiklasKunkel want to restate any opinions here?
I'd merge this. I hope the gas prices do not change enough to over pass the 5000, otherwise we will be in a trouble. Then I say in a nice thing to have. My only question would be if there is any added value to declare the variable as uint128
instead of uint256
.
The 5000 gas is so far over the current actual cost that it should be immune to future restructuring of gas prices.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 8:13 AM Gonzalo Balabasquer < notifications@github.com> wrote:
I'd merge this. I hope the gas prices do not change enough to over pass the 5000, otherwise we will be in a trouble. Then I say in a nice thing to have. My only question would be if there is any added value to declare the variable as uint128 instead of uint256.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dapphub/ds-proxy/pull/13#issuecomment-441378252, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABu7vdx48GqXQpvg0FgZ2MtSzSUddbE6ks5uyXAdgaJpZM4Qh-8j .
Yeah I guess the 4200 gas gap should be more than enough, however should it hurt somehow to have it manageable?
Minor update to add variable instead of hard coded gas value in delegatecall.