Closed nanexcool closed 4 years ago
I think better would be to add the assumption that other contracts mentioned are also =/= 0
@MrChico ah ok, in that case I have no idea what to do lol
Check calls
, grab unique contracts (different than the current subject
) and add them to the if
Any update on this? I've checked it works on this run
https://reports.makerfoundation.com/k-dss/33d35d2934cfc47ccb98/
Yeah, this looks good. Thanks @nanexcool !
This is conflicting when running proofs with other proofs as lemmas. Per @MrChico " the assumption that
ACCT_ID =/= 0
might not be provable for other contracts"