Missing dependency 'typing_extensions'

dapr / python-sdk

Dapr SDK for Python

Apache License 2.0

223 stars 125 forks source link

Missing dependency 'typing_extensions' #538

Closed worming004 closed 1 year ago

worming004 commented 1 year ago

Expected Behavior

When installing dapr sdk, a project using sdk should run with all required dependencies

Actual Behavior

A project using the sdk do not run because of a missing dependency

Steps to Reproduce the Problem

Use a fresh computer without any pre-installed python libraries
Follow the doc until https://docs.dapr.io/getting-started/quickstarts/pubsub-quickstart/#step-4-publish-a-topic
Following the step 4, the application cannot start

Release Note

RELEASE NOTE: FIX dependencies resolution

Note for maintainers

I am not a python developer, I do not know how pip resolve dependencies. So I cannot propose quickly a PR to resolve this issue. Anyway, thanks for your job !

berndverst commented 1 year ago

Sorry for the delay - I am releasing Dapr Python SDK 1.9.1 right now to address this.

tmacam commented 1 year ago

I add an issue to add a validation step (or adjust the existing one) to catch issues like this in the future.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:08 AM Bernd Verst @.***> wrote:

Sorry for the delay - I am releasing Dapr Python SDK 1.9.1 right now to address this.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dapr/python-sdk/issues/538#issuecomment-1478129228, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAW4QOUYZMDCEMUS76PXL3W5HHABANCNFSM6AAAAAAVUV5HK4 . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

-- Cheers.

Tiago Alves Macambira

berndverst commented 1 year ago

I'll add that pinging in the Python SDK channel in Discord is a good way to get my attention. I would have fixed this 2 weeks ago when this issue was filed had I seen this issue. I get too many GitHub notifications for too many repos - so I end up ignoring all those notifications.

worming004 commented 1 year ago

No problem, I guess that Python developers would have figured out, and resolving it manually is easy. Imo it wasn't the most urgent things to resolve

tmacam commented 1 year ago

Created #546 to avoid this in the future.

This was closed by #545, right? And #544 is a duplicate of this one.

berndverst commented 1 year ago

Created #546 to avoid this in the future.

This was closed by #545, right? And #544 is a duplicate of this one.

Correct. This is resolve in SDK 1.9.1