Closed shivamkm07 closed 8 months ago
Attention: 7 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
5c10b78
) 86.43% compared to head (8eaba3c
) 86.54%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
My strong preference is for self contained PRs. So if you'd like to introduce a logger to be used for all Python SDKs, I would like to see that done in a single PR. That's why I am asking for the logger code to be moved to the workflow extension directory for now. As long as the code is self contained there I will approve :)
In the future we could still migrate that to be at the top level of the repo, but at that point I'd like the same PR to contain the switch to that logger throughout all SDKs.
My strong preference is for self contained PRs. So if you'd like to introduce a logger to be used for all Python SDKs, I would like to see that done in a single PR. That's why I am asking for the logger code to be moved to the workflow extension directory for now. As long as the code is self contained there I will approve :)
In the future we could still migrate that to be at the top level of the repo, but at that point I'd like the same PR to contain the switch to that logger throughout all SDKs.
Done. @berndverst Please review
Description
This PR does the following:
Issue reference
We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.
Please reference the issue this PR will close: #626
Checklist
Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list: