Fix issues from 0.4.0 - Githubissues

daqana / dqrng

Fast Pseudo Random Number Generators for R

https://daqana.github.io/dqrng/

Other

42 stars 8 forks source link

Fix issues from 0.4.0 #90

Closed rstub closed 6 months ago

rstub commented 6 months ago

fixes #89 fixes #88

github-actions[bot] commented 6 months ago

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if f4e93760df618851d967306609156ea07d2f5f13 is merged into main:

:heavy_check_mark:rexp_test: 91.7ms -> 90.1ms [-6.11%, +2.58%]
:rocket:rnorm_test: 114ms -> 111ms [-4.64%, -0.39%]
:heavy_check_mark:runif_test: 75.2ms -> 74.5ms [-4.44%, +2.5%] Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

github-actions[bot] commented 6 months ago

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if f4e93760df618851d967306609156ea07d2f5f13 is merged into main:

:heavy_check_mark:rexp_test: 86.7ms -> 83.7ms [-8.1%, +1.26%]
:heavy_check_mark:rnorm_test: 109ms -> 107ms [-4.59%, +0.88%]
:heavy_check_mark:runif_test: 67.7ms -> 68.2ms [-1.94%, +3.18%] Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

github-actions[bot] commented 6 months ago

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 009c86bdbda0cfeaa9a3024cc4c0b1e715b8c327 is merged into main:

:heavy_check_mark:rexp_test: 81ms -> 81.2ms [-1.21%, +1.73%]
:heavy_check_mark:rnorm_test: 106ms -> 105ms [-1.5%, +1.13%]
:heavy_check_mark:runif_test: 65ms -> 65ms [-0.9%, +0.92%] Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.