Open darkdestry-t opened 3 years ago
Dear tester,
Thank you for finding this bug, however, we have decided to reject this bug as this is an intentional design that we have considered.
In your example: "Alex Yeoh" in the passenger list (left) refers to the passenger Alex Yeoh with the phone number 91234567. "Alex Yeoh" in the pool list (right) refers to the driver Alex Yeoh with the phone number 99999999. Where the driver Alex Yeoh (phone 99999999) is the driver of the pool with the passenger Alex Yeoh (phone 91234567).
In prior discussions that we have had internally, we have determined that there is no issue where two people with the same names with different phone numbers exist, and this has been taken into account as our design.
Nevertheless, thank you for highlighting this.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.Low
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
The phone number supplied to the pool command can be different from the driver's phone number