Change in the content.pot file.

[lebmich]

New wording to clarify the concept of duplicate instance. I hope ...

[elstoc]

Hmm I'm not convinced this is really any clearer. Also, you can't just modify the content.pot file, you have to change the original markdown files themselves.

Perhaps if you could clarify what you think is wrong with the current wording, I could suggest an alternative.

[lebmich]

In the English version of the user manual we have:

duplicate instance Create a new instance of the current module with all of its parameters inherited from the parent module.

I think the expression "inherited from the parent module" is not precise enough. What must be expressed is that the values of the parameters of the new instance are those of the parameters of the instance which is being duplicated.

[paperdigits]

That is what the phrase "inherited from the parent" means though.

On November 14, 2021 9:44:39 PM PST, Michel Leblond @.***> wrote:

In the English version of the user manual we have:

duplicate instance Create a new instance of the current module with all of its parameters inherited from the parent module.

I think the expression "inherited from the parent module" is not precise enough. What must be expressed is that the values of the parameters of the new instance are those of the parameters of the instance which is being duplicated.

-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/darktable-org/dtdocs/pull/376#issuecomment-968557985

[lebmich]

Maybe we could write "inherited from the parent instance"

[lebmich]

or better : "inherited from its parent instance"

[lebmich]

We could write: duplicate instance Create a new instance of the current module with its parameters settings inherited from its parent instance.

[elstoc]

The rest of the section refers to "current instance" so we'll go with that