Open genjix opened 10 years ago
+1. I heard one of you guys mentioning the idea before, plausible deniability would be a great step forward.
Just my thoughts - the definition of "wallets" and "identities" should be cleared up first. I see both used. Are they the same? Or is an identity a collection of wallets? (For now, I see the former as true.)
And any ideas how to toggle hidden identities? Maybe do it the TrueCrypt-way, having it embedded into another identity and you have to give a different password to access it?
I think there is merit to the Truecrypt method.
Prerequisites:
One Problem: Being able to discern a hidden identity and a normal one by the filesize. Possible solution: Make hidden identities be barebones that can't save more than a certain number of contacts or some other method to lower data usage for the hidden wallet. Or bloat normal wallets with dummy data to make all wallets the same size.
@genjix, please could you add this account (https://github.com/caedesvvv2) to the darkwallet repo temporarily (with write access). I've lost access to the other one and need to sort that out with github support.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
@genjix please check your e-mail which I will have sent something to in a few on this very matter.
ty.
caedesvvv2:
@genjix, please could you add this account (https://github.com/caedesvvv2) to the darkwallet repo temporarily (with write access). I've lost access to the other one and need to sort that out with github support.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/darkwallet/darkwallet/issues/128#issuecomment-68627141
http://abis.io ~ "a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good" https://keybase.io/odinn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUqQ/MAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CwiUH/RryqBkmGHrHA6G5Xq3ZFDUF LDb4PdO8yNCSRenXfal28eYjIz77oCUrQSL/fqAWsl2JTitOLT24klPNfcpu7pGO hXQ4eevyGE86E1q1V9KNNFaDNjUo65fHtvUTEldPVwA7CFD4qk7Qa4rtOhc0lW37 6wbMOrx3ohdDp1qfy03zqFNUW0hIoKlGwhlCsxBntTBZLkKp7izUpx7I1+IrpKls y8VTVIJkdlwj71AyZH/rkRDS/vjOIwvXY05y47ITQlmBy1sRzumMKfd98k/s5NIu UW6O9Z60tSPK2ztRv6IzcZ8oGbQVJNw0/AiHKZymF8DdEspc/McpJQoMyAOr+to= =wDp+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
@genjix, ASAP to above.
careful, caedesvvv2 above is an attacker of some sort
We have this idiot too.
@hoffmabc, yes you do.
@caedesvvv2 if you were real, you would know how to get in touch with genjix (not through a git issue ticket)... I wouldn't be surprised if you were associated with forces responsible for the community raids in Spain.
Just get the accounts banned by GitHub staff as you see them.
If I use my wallet on a public machine with other people, there should be a way to have identities but unseen in the UI.
It's not perfect against analysis, and in the future you could even use plausible deniability, but it's better than all identities being publically viewable.