I have a use case where I would like to cache HTTP 301 and HTTP 302 responses. The list of cacheable response codes seems hard coded in isCacheableCode.
I understand this list comes directly from the RFC . Would there be an appetite for a PR to make this list configurable for non standard use cases like mine?
Hello,
I have a use case where I would like to cache HTTP 301 and HTTP 302 responses. The list of cacheable response codes seems hard coded in isCacheableCode.
I understand this list comes directly from the RFC . Would there be an appetite for a PR to make this list configurable for non standard use cases like mine?