Closed vic1707 closed 1 year ago
The rules should be working in the current state, but the "non conflicting operators" one can be largely improved and needs to get the lists of incompatible decorators.
@darraghoriordan do you know if the "typeCheckingDecorator" are all mutually exclusive (like setting IsString
and IsBoolean
are obviously incompatible)? If so it would drastically simplify the rule.
hey!
I had a look at this and the tests didn't pass on my machine. I downloaded it, yarn && yarn build && yarn test
oops. didn't mean to close
Got it, the add of the quick fix on one of the rules broke the tests
tests are now fixed @darraghoriordan. Before considering the merge I'd still need some clues about the non conflicting operators. Also I'm searching for a way to get the quickfix to figure out the indentation of the code
@darraghoriordan do we have an update on this?
heya! I need a bit of time to understand this one better. no eta unfortunately. I'll try to get to it in Sept 2022 though! 👍
okay 👍
Hello @darraghoriordan I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass or whatever but it's been 1 month since you've said you'll check my PR. Did you got the time to look at it? Maybe you need some help to understand my code?
Hello @darraghoriordan I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass or whatever but it's been 1 month since you've said you'll check my PR. Did you got the time to look at it? Maybe you need some help to understand my code?
hey! No sorry I just don't have the time. It's a large PR adding rules to the default set.
It will take me hours to review and test it and I have too many other things that are higher priority at the moment.
see previous comments
Okay, thx for the review and the release of the other pr
Since the original PR (#23) seems dead I took the liberty to copy the code and fix (I hope) all the requested changes.
At time of writting I think I just have to split the rule in two as asked in one of the comments.