first of all, thanks a lot for this perfect library :) After taking a look into the documentation of the rule: api-method-should-specify-api-operation, i noticed that there might be an error regarding the expected decorator. The corresponding implementation checks for the right decorators: ApiResponse(...), ..., but the title of the rule is confusing. I would assume a rule title like api-method-should-specify-api-response not api-method-should-specify-api-operation.
Hey,
first of all, thanks a lot for this perfect library :) After taking a look into the documentation of the rule: api-method-should-specify-api-operation, i noticed that there might be an error regarding the expected decorator. The corresponding implementation checks for the right decorators:
ApiResponse(...), ...
, but the title of the rule is confusing. I would assume a rule title like api-method-should-specify-api-response not api-method-should-specify-api-operation.Can i create a pull request for it?