Open devoncarew opened 1 month ago
We split them up a while ago, to make it easier to understand which one failed. I am fine with switching back though.
Perhaps we could run them as separate steps in a build? Or have some other way to group the output to help call out which steps failed.
I normally only look at the steps which failed, which is why am fine with the current solution. I don't think there is a way to group actions, that would be ideal..
What do you mean with run them as separate steps in a build
?
Something like:
I'd have to look at how the health.yml file is set up - it might surface as having individual steps in a steps:
section? It would probably mean a bit of an architectural change to the file.
The health check workflow runs several (~6) builds per PR; we may want to consider consolidating the checks into one build, just for a simpler presentation in the PR UI. Here's the existing PR checks UI:
cc @mosuem