`package_api_docs` false negative

[afgriffiths]

Steps to Reproduce

Create a new Dart project (designed to be a consumable package). Add the following contents to analysis_options.yaml

linter:
  rules:
    - avoid_classes_with_only_static_members
    - package_api_docs

In lib create a new file called date_utils.dart with the following contents (lifted straight from the bad example at the page for the avoid_classes_with_only_static_members lint):

class DateUtils {
  static DateTime mostRecent(List<DateTime> dates) {
    return dates.reduce((a, b) => a.isAfter(b) ? a : b);
  }
}

Expected behaviour

Running dart analyze in the directory should complain of a violation of both avoid_classes_with_only_static_members and package_api_docs since:

• DateUtils is a class with only static members
• The whole date_utils.dart file contains no doc comments and it's publicly accessible (since it lives in lib)

Actual behaviour

Run dart analyze in the directory and observe that no violations are found.

Environment Information

Dart Version: 2.12.3 Operating System: Windows 10 64-bit

[scheglov]

@pq @bwilkerson

[pq]

See also #2731 for the avoid_classes_with_only_static_members false negative. Not sure about the package_api_docs issue...

[pq]

The avoid_classes_with_only_static_members issue has been fixed.

[fzyzcjy]

Same here, package_api_docs does not work sometimes...

[pq]

As of https://github.com/dart-lang/linter/issues/3395, this lint is essentially a no-op. Assuming interest, we could revisit I think given the new workspace support. Alternatively we should deprecate and remove.

/fyi @bwilkerson @keertip

[bwilkerson]

What is the difference between package_api_docs and public_member_api_docs? (The docs for those lints aren't very clear.)

[pq]

https://github.com/dart-lang/linter/issues/1373 😄