search

dasaderi / WhyNotOpenScience

MIT License
10 stars 8 forks source link

Taking pilot survey #16

Open SamanthaHindle opened 7 years ago

SamanthaHindle commented 7 years ago

Here is my feedback. I hope it's useful. I really liked the survey and I'm looking forward to seeing the results.

  1. Is there a way to change the answer format for the "Other" option as it's a bit annoying trying to add a long answer and only being able to see a few words of your sentence.
  2. For your question "If you have any other positive comments about Open Science, please write them here." seemed redundant after the "Other" option in the question before it, so maybe you could get rid of "Other" and just have this question as this would solve point 1 above.
  3. For your question "Please rate the importance of the following factors in choosing a journal for publication of your work" ...For your options of "it allows postprints"...what does this mean?
  4. For your question "How many of these papers did you make Open Access? (write a number)" I was wondering if "were OA" would be better than "did you make OA"?
  5. For your question "Focusing on your papers that are NOT Open Access, what are your reasons for not making them Open Access? (select all that apply) "...should the option that says "I could publish it as a postprint"...should that say "preprint"?

Good luck with the project!! :)

dasaderi commented 7 years ago

Thank you so much @SamanthaHindle!