feat(sdk): including grovedb proof bytes when error in proof verification

[QuantumExplorer]

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Proof errors in grovedb were not giving the client the actual proof, this fixes that.

What was done?

Returning a different error for proof errors.

How Has This Been Tested?

Not tested, but simple change.

Breaking Changes

Not breaking

Checklist:

• [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
• [x] I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
• [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

• [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new error variant, GroveDBError, to enhance error handling related to GroveDB operations.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved error mapping logic in the maybe_from_proof_with_metadata methods for better clarity and context in error messages.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new error variant, GroveDBError, to the Error enum in the error.rs file, enhancing error handling for GroveDB-related issues. This variant includes fields for proof_bytes, height, time_ms, and an error description. Additionally, the error handling in the maybe_from_proof_with_metadata methods across various implementations of the FromProof trait has been refined to provide more specific error context. Import statements have also been updated, but no existing error variants or public entity signatures were altered.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
packages/rs-drive-proof-verifier/src/error.rs	Added new error variant GroveDBError { proof_bytes: Vec<u8>, height: u64, time_ms: u64, error: String } to Error enum.
packages/rs-drive-proof-verifier/src/proof.rs	Updated error handling in maybe_from_proof_with_metadata methods to differentiate GroveDB errors from others. Renamed metadata to mtd for consistency.

Possibly related PRs

• #2234: Modifications to error handling in the WithdrawFromIdentity trait, enhancing error reporting similar to the GroveDBError variant.
• #2331: Enhancement of the fetch_many method to include metadata and proof, related to the new error handling capabilities introduced in the main PR.

Suggested labels

enhancement, rs-sdk

Suggested reviewers

• shumkov

Poem

In the garden of code, a new error grows,
GroveDBError, with bytes it bestows.
With clarity now, our errors will sing,
In the world of proofs, let the right messages spring!
🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.