Closed mmccarty closed 2 years ago
dask-drmaa
and dask-searchcv
are both archived on GitHub, so probably not a huge issue.
dask-glm
and dask-gateway
are not though so I would suggest we need to add more (all?) of the core maintainer team to these in order to reduce the bus factor.
Thanks for looking into this @mmccarty
cc @TomAugspurger and @jcrist
dask-glm can be archived.
It is worth noting that we have added some non-core
devs as maintainers of some packages. So it doesn't need to be a core
member (though that is always an option)
Absolutely agree about adding non-core folks. However I think it is good to have reasonable core coverage as we are the ones who are typically funded to step in and fix things in a pinch.
Thanks for helping increase the bus factor @mmccarty : ) It sounds like the only project of concern is dask-gateway
(given the others either already are, or can be, archived). I see there's an issue over in dask-gateway
about releasing https://github.com/dask/dask-gateway/issues/381 -- should we close this issue and continue the dask-gateway
-specific conversation over there?
Thanks all! Closing this issue.
The following packages in the Dask org have sole maintainers on PyPI:
I'm not sure if any of these are active (apart from Dask Gateway), but I thought I would list them anyway.